Intellectuals should be Superstars Not Bimbos

“Today, I was privileged to have a conversation with a very intelligent Frenchman. I explored with him the matter of the French attitude towards intellectuals – and learnt that theirs is an enviable stance indeed.

Before I speak of what he spoke of, perhaps I should paint a little background to my perspective on his words. I grew up in Britain. This is a country where, in most schools, to be an intellectual is to suffer a kind of social disease. The gifted child will be almost universally ill-treated, if they have not developed sufficient social skills to deflect such attacks. It is a culture that made being gifted a burden indeed – and one that many children tried to shrug off, by dumbing down: they felt that they had to, because the social environment gave them no choice but to do so.

France, however, stands in contrast to this. The gifted child is, according to my French associate, respected by his fellows and, what’s more, the gifted child’s parents are well-looked upon, for having raised such a child. I was stunned by that. In many cultures, the parents of a gifted child are actually greeted with incomprehension and the view that they have somehow pushed their child into this “gifted” state. The idea that the parents would actually be admired for their child was a new one for me.

It didn’t end there. Throughout French society there is a pervasive respect for the intellectually gifted. Intellectuals actually become media stars. They are listened to with respect and their opinions sought on every matter under the sun. To be an intellectual in France, is often also to be a public figure of some standing. How odd. I don’t remember Britain being like that, in the main. Intellectuals did not have the prominence that say, a footballer would have, or a Page Three model (a “topless” model), would have. In Britain it was the “celebrity” who had a sway over the people – not those people who actually had a mind to form opinions and a will to speak them.

France actually has celebrity philosophers. That, in itself, says all that we need to know about the situation of the intellectual, in that culture.

The world would be a better place, in every way, were intellectuals received with the welcome, everywhere, that they receive in France. For a start it could begin in the world’s schools. If they were like French ones, there would be no jealousy of the gifted child, from their peers – but a widely held respect. That would surely change the life stories of many gifted children for the better.

Yet, the benefits wouldn’t stop there. I believe that every nation that adopted this positive attitude towards its gifted, would benefit, thereby. Their cultures would flourish and deepen, their nations would prosper. Why? Because the best among them would no longer have to hide their gifts; they would no longer have to “dumb down” to enable themselves to fit in: they could soar, instead, to the heights they were born to achieve. They could finally, fully become. How much better a world that would be.”

Extracted from The Boy Who Knew Too Much

This is a very inspirational post and i hope it might happen in near future. If the human race is to progress we have to be more receptive to the gifted, they will create the next wave in human advancements.

I am a keen supporter of Social Darwinism, intelligence breeds intelligence. We got to continue the cycle of reproducing more people of a higher intelligence to continue the rate of intellectual progress of the society so it moves forward instead of backwards. Probably Lee Kuan Yew foresaw that 30 years ago in setting up the Social Development Unit for unmarried graduate couples. It will be a pretty darn waste if they don’t continue passing down their gene pool after all the thousands of years of human evolution that has been endowed to them.

Theory is Unreal.

The essential notion is that the relationship between theory and its users must always be open to evaluation and reinterpretation through the process of research whether “real world” or in the “classroom”

However, this seems too obvious, almost banal. After all most students of business have a notion that theory is unreal or suspect – almost by definition. The problem is that to move beyond simple assessments that theory, such as Porter’s diamond, the product life cycle or the Boston Consulting Group matrix, are right or wrong requires more detailed accounts of how these ideas are used by the academy that takes primary responsibility for them. Thus, accounts need to focus on the pragmatic employment of theory to develop effective and workable solutions for specific contexts. This might encourage a more reflective, pragmatic and critical appreciation among students of management education concerning the potential of theory.

Extracted from Some Academic Source written by 3 Professors


Maybe i should write this for my thesis.

“Management theories hold true for rats. You can theorize rat behavior as they are very predictable creatures. The theories don’t hold true for humans. Humans are unpredictable creatures, they bite when least unexpected.”

LOL i wonder what the aussie lecturers will think when they read it.

Born Naked

and we die naked.

In the whole wide world, we are the only species that invented clothes for cosmetic reasons. I doubt aliens wear clothes either (maybe functional suites for protection). Humans are so caught up with their appearances that they try to mask every flaw they have. In other words, humans are insecure beings. Every single one of us, deep down our hearts, is just a playful child (ego). Just that we don’t let it out to play because of societal norms. When we grow up, we hide our inner child and “act” like a grown up.

I don’t understand what is wrong with our bodies, we come in different shapes and sizes but that doesn’t make us any different. We are still human. I believe the day when the human race unites as one is the day we are not concerned with any inequalities. Social class, skin colour, birth right… they are all just made up terms to make us feel “special” about ourselves and label the rest as inferiors.

We are similar to animals. We hunt for food, breed to reproduce and fight for territories. Humans are promiscuous, they mate with several partners over their lifetime. It is only due to the introduction of marriage for the societal reasons (the family unit to raise up kids) that humans curb their urges and resort to underground methods to satisfy them. That is why there is a demand for porn, prostitution and one night stands.

Our civilization has deteriorated over the times. The rise and fall of monarchies have lead to a disillusioned race. With the onset of the industrial revolution and economy, we think that we are prosperous, only to feel empty within. There is this sense of lost of purpose when everyone is racing against time for some unknown reason.